The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mister Supranational[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Totally unsourced article about a brand new beauty pageant for men, previously deleted at AfD as Mister Supranational 2016 (the male counterpart to equally non-notable Miss Supranational, an article that has been deleted multiple times, and recreated almost as many times). - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 10:20, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete article is not sourced.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:34, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. If the article clears A7 (organized event with no assertion of notability), it doesn't do it by much. An initial search brings up Times of India coverage for the 2016 pageant, but TOI reports on almost every pageant. Not much to work with. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since it's owned by the same people as Miss Supranational I decided to send it to AfD instead of tagging it for speedy deletion, in order to have the non-notability of the pageant properly established. Which in my experience makes it easier to get recreations of the article, of which there no doubt will be quite a few (see Miss Supranational), deleted. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 18:52, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm okay with that, so delete. Further searching for reliable source coverage gets only photos with brief mentions. Fails WP:GNG and WP:EVENT. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article did not meet WP:GNG and WP:EVENT.--Richie Campbell (talk) 03:08, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- promotional trivia. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.