The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete & redirect to Mitra Kukar FC.

Mitra Kukar FC U-21[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is just a youth section of Mitra Kukar FC. It is not separately notable. There are no reliable sources that discuss the youth section. Google News search returns no hits. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:47, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – I think it should be kept as they were the runner-up for the 2012–13 Indonesia Super League U-21. I think it's enough for notability. I will add the sources later. MbahGondrong (talk) 00:33, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – I'm not convinced of the notability of the youth division of a club. There is nothing to indicate this club meets WP:FOOTYN, and of the two sources listed, one is the club's own website. There is insufficient evidence to demonstrate to me that WP:GNG has been met. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 04:47, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable youth team, worth a sentence in the main club article, but against merge. Fenix down (talk) 15:54, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Mitra Kukar FC; not independently notable but possible search term. Giant Snowman 21:01, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.