The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:33, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mobile Monday[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability for 5 years; I couldn't establish notability. Boleyn (talk) 20:38, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 21:10, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 21:10, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:35, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mobile Monday is an international org of some notability with local groups and events for mobile technology in quite a wide range of cities. A google search gives an overview of the various cities where MM has a presence, and the level of activity, which in itself is notable, IMHO. Egil (talk) 06:21, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:BIGNUMBER. Notability is established through mentions in third-party reliable sources. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:20, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tempted to agree with Egil, but I can't seem to find anything for WP:NGO other than self-published websites, passing mentions and a number of PRs. Funny ^Pika! 23:24, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 02:52, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not covered in secondary sources. Dreambeaver(talk) 22:47, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.