The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:50, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mobile weapons[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While individual Gundams may be notable in and of themselves, this concept is adequately covered in the Gundam Wiki and violates WP:NOTPLOT on Wikipedia. It appears to be non-notable, and all sources are WP:PRIMARY. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 14:52, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:28, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:28, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:28, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to Mobile Suit Gundam mecha as it pertains to suits, weapons, and armor and not just weapons, and then trim down per WP:NOTWIKIA and apply lots of WP:TNT for unsourced material. The navbox has a list of the most notable "Mobile weapons" which are different types of Gundams. Redirect Mobile weapons to Maneuver warfare which seems to be about mobile weapons in the real world. Most of the news searches on the Internet for pertain to real world mobile weapons and not Gundam ones. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:52, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The articles in the navbox may not be notable either. This just seems like the most obvious example of WP:NOTPLOT but articles like Psyco Gundam appear incredibly dubious too. So that's not an indicator that this article might be notable if pared down._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 17:11, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While Gundam series has cultural significance, individual weapons don't. This is just a list of stuff that was deemed non-notable years prior, merged here and as I predicted, this will be deleted eventually. I guess this eventuallity is now. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:05, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - @AngusWOOF:, lets just save the references and start over. You can always move what is here to draft or user-space for future improvement. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:43, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom and Piotrus, above; not notable for stand alone article. Kierzek (talk) 17:47, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.