The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted G7 per creators request, no other substantial edits by other editors made except for reverts and placed tags. No current keep votes or keep votes prior to users request for G7 (blanked page/comment) Calmer Waters 05:46, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Montgomery Little League[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD by the creator (who admits to a conflict of interest). The subject fails WP:ORG. The article cites no sources that discuss the group (only mention it briefly or list it), and other than being claimed to be the second oldest club, there is nothing significant about the group. The claim of being the second oldest club is also unsourced, as the reference for this claim is a dead link. Inks.LWC (talk) 04:48, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —Inks.LWC (talk) 04:51, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. —Inks.LWC (talk) 04:51, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Google search doesn't reveal extensive coverage beyond local paper. 76.248.147.81 (talk) 05:00, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to throw this much of a fit about this, just delete it already. Another league member will create it again, don't you worry... JHawkins1128 (talk) 05:37, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.