The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Happy Editing, Dusti^{talk to me} 18:43, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moquette[edit]

Delete, no indication that this carpet brand/style/kind is notable, no sources showing significant coverage in 3rd party reliable sources. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Obviously notable. A case of So fix it. Colonel Warden (talk) 13:55, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in its current form, or restore the redirect to Bus spotting, as I originally created Moquette. ··· rWd · Talk ··· 21:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Creating this article as a redirect to bus spotting seems bizarre. Why did you do it? Anyway, the fact that moquette fabric is widely used in public transportation (presumably because it is hard-wearing) is further evidence of the topic's notability. Colonel Warden (talk) 13:20, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep- Certainly needs expansion; as far as fabrics are concerned it seems notable.Rigby27 (talk) 14:10, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - already has references to indicate some notability. Colonel Warden pointed to many other books that mention the carpet. It would be nice if someone turned it into a larger article but as a stub it has more content and more references than many stubs. Sbowers3 (talk) 20:09, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.