The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep with major revision. It is difficult to discern consensus elements among the responses. Many of the requests to delete are based on general opposition to this class of article. In order to satisfy most of the people most of the time, here is what I suggest: the article should be whittled down to instances where the use of Morse Code is a major plot element which can be supported by a secondary source citation, which would in most cases apply to instances of literature (movies, novels, etc.). For instance, the Rudyard Kipling book A Code of Morals and the use in the film Independence Day are good examples of this; the vast majority of other references are trivial. The same holds true for music (songs, themes, etc.), except in this case the vast majority are trivial references. What to do with the material to be excised? I was thinking that category usage might be appropriate ... but I'm concerned that such categories would appear for deletion based on the same argument as was used to bring this article up for deletion. Perhaps a template so that all instances of use can be identified via what-links-here? Whatever the fate of the 'trivial' content, the fate of the 'notable' content is to retain in this article (name changes and mergers might take place later and are not disallowed by this decision). --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 17:17, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DRV overturned the original closure of this AfD to outright delete. Xoloz 19:51, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Morse code in popular culture[edit]

Morse code in popular culture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Again, Wikipedia is not a place to throw a trivia collection list like that. Delete per trivia cruft--JForget 23:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.