The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as hoax. Hog Farm _Talk 04:54, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Malaueg[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Potential hoax.

I've performed Google, Google Books, Google News and Scholar searches and found no substantial results.

What I did find is that there is a town and a community called Malaueg. Both topics might be covered by their own articles.

Google maps coordinate, which is named "Mount Malaueg, Rizal, Cagayan", points to a river bed and has the Church of Malaueg as its picture.

Now for the terrain. The article claims that it is a 1092 meter mountain with the lowest elevation at 530 meters. Thing is, the area where the coordinates are pointing to is in a river bed and the general topography of the immediate area barely rise above 100 meters. Lenticel ^(talk) 00:49, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Philippines. Lenticel ^(talk) 00:49, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete = I think the nom is right about it being a hoax, but in any case there is no significant coverage. Indeed, other than pages that seem to source Wikipedia in one way or another, I cannot find any mention at all. Nothing in books, newspapers or other papers. Regardless of whether it is a hoax, it fails on significant coverage. The "was" in the page suggests the mountain has gone. The only way that could happen is with an extremely significant volcanic eruption which would surely have got quite a lot of coverage! Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:32, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as a WP:HOAX and send it to WP:HOAXLIST. This article has been on Wikipedia for 10 years, 1 month, and 30 days. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 12:25, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nomination. I don't find even a single notable source or reference. It looks like a WP:HOAX, so it should be deleted. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 19:38, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as a hoax and send it to WP:HOAXLIST. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 00:14, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as WP:G3/WP:HOAX. SBKSPP (talk) 01:28, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:G3 as clearly WP:HOAX. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 13:05, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete (WP:G3): Obvious WP:HOAX. Add it to WP:HOAXLIST. Chompy Ace 00:55, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.