The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:13, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Movies.io[edit]

Movies.io (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been online since 2012 and has seen nothing in the way of improvement. A Google search turns up little to affirm its notability, as per WP:WEB requirements. And Adoil Descended (talk) 15:52, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. This article has no sources, and I found no reliable sources on the Web either. Searching on Wikipedia offers little that would de-orphan the article, so I don't think it can really go anywhere that has a hope of salvaging it. In the best interest of Wikipedia, ~Ngeaup (talk) 17:06, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Highbeam and Questia searches turned up nothing, so it is down to the handful of reviews from the Google search. While complimentary, these are effectively new product reviews; I think they fall short of the in-depth coverage needed for WP:WEBCRIT. AllyD (talk) 07:43, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per everyone above me - Found nothing, No evidence of notability to warrant its own article. –Davey2010^Talk 15:10, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.