The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:02, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mrs. World[edit]

Mrs. World (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:GNG due to lack of independent sources about the contest itself. The Banner talk 14:58, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 15:26, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 15:26, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 15:44, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I am seeing a few mentions in reliable sources, such as this, but I am not sure if these sources actually address the article subject. sst✈ 15:49, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not a notable event see WP:EVENT Legacypac (talk) 05:58, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as the current article is questionably notable for the applicable guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 04:30, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.