The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G3: Blatant hoax. Jujutacular (talk) 23:28, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Muddy May[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, fails WP:GNG. HindWiki^Connect 23:50, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was unable to find anything related to this topic through various Google searches. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:13, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Hoax. I cannot find anything, and the image is fake. Marcocapelle moved the page from the author's page w/o deleting the redirect so that is why that weirdness exists. L3X1 (distænt write)05:47, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 03:44, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it is high time Wikipedia stopped having sourceless articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:53, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.