The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:36, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't appear to satisfy notability criteria, and seems overly self-promotional. --DAJF (talk) 10:04, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable web magazine which does seem self-promotional. I can't verify the references in Japanese as I don't know the language. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 01:58, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.