- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:03, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Muslim Slavs[edit]
- Muslim Slavs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The same as Eastern Orthodox Slavs and Orthodox Slavs, nothing more than a loose collection of WP:OR and WP:SYNTH to imply an inherent connection between speakers of Slavic languages who just so happen to be Muslims. Thesmp (talk) 14:04, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - per nom rational - it's also highly prejudicial.--౪ Santa ౪99° 07:55, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, agreed that it's a general categorization just like the other two previously deleted. It doesn't even seem to be actually supported by the source phrasing as far as I could glean - the first three sources don't actually emphasize religion + Slavs, but religion + geolocation. Whatever is useful from the article text can be used to expand the Slavs#Religion section. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 14:06, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete - Would much rather a complete rework based on religion and geographical region but I think that that is too large a task. Perhaps extract useful information into Slavs#Religion.Gusfriend (talk) 22:18, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.