The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 16:42, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mustard Film Company[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 18:15, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 18:16, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:CORP. I can't find any significant coverage about the company in independent, reliable sources. The references that are in the article are about members of staff or their work, but not about the company. If no one has taken notice of the company, then we shouldn't have an article about it. SmartSE (talk) 15:48, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Basically a set of resumes and list of awards at this time. -- :- ) Don 18:02, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The significant proportion of this article is mini-biographies of the firm's employees (often in a chatty, twee, non-encyclopaedic tone, but that's a question of style and taste rather than AfD). Some are referenced (usually to one or more production credits), some aren't, all take this article under WP:BLP requirements, currently being failed by the article. AllyD (talk) 07:01, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unusually for an article about a media company, this didn't contain a link to the company's website. However on locating it, the biography texts that were the substantial part of the article were the same texts found there. I've deleted these as WP:COPYVIO, and added the company site as an External link. AllyD (talk) 08:23, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm not finding anything to establish this firm as notable in terms of WP:CORPDEPTH. The article lists awards won by productions with which individuals on its roster have been associated, but unless the company itself was the determining factor in these successes, this would be only a claim of inherited notability. AllyD (talk) 08:28, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 07:49, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 01:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.