The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DeleteCenariumTalk 20:34, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mutual Anomaly Research Center and Evaluation Network[edit]
Keep, and go on and keep on challenging all of my articles. Interesting that you couldn't argue "not enough sources" for this one. I just love wasting my time because of you. In fact, I'm done with Wikipedia after this. SeanFromIT (talk) 20:30, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's nothing against you Sean. Please read our policies on notability. All the articles I have looked at so far do not meet the criteria for inclusion. If you sourced them well then I would be more than happy to vote keep and edit them. --mboverload@ 06:45, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of non-trivial indepndent sources Guy (Help!) 07:54, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Like the man said, lack of non-trivial, independent sources. --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 09:49, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.