The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, fails notability. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:49, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My Fault[edit]

Delete per WP:MUSIC#Songs, WP:V and WP:OR. The song was not released as a single and therefore it doesn't deserve a separate. No citations and pure original research as well. Do U(knome)? ^yes...|_{or no} · 00:17, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- --/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 02:07, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC#Songs. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 02:39, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect to The Slim Shady LP. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 16:50, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Merge what? It's all unsourced! Do U(knome)? ^yes...|_{or no} · 18:58, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply. Redirect and merge whatever is sourced. The article's infobox has sources. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 22:44, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What?!? Is there even an Infobox to this article? Where do you see it? Do U(knome)? ^yes...|_{or no} · 22:50, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? I must have been hallunicating again. Darn it, I guess I have to go back into rehab. Okay, redirect, and merge whatever is sourced. If nothing is sourced, than don't merge anything. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 23:34, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.