The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted as A7. While the text is actually quite neutral, there is just no claim at all, that this is notable and no sources. SoWhy 22:24, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mystic Galaxies[edit]

Mystic Galaxies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No notability, no appearances on Google besides their own website, forums, and self-published sources The359 (talk) 23:47, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Non notable company. Article probably created by company owner as logo was uploaded with statement that the owner created it himself. Almost a speedy candidate as spam. Unusual? Quite ^TalkQu 23:52, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete as spam. Alexius08 (talk) 01:37, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No found reliable third-party souces. Zero Kitsune (talk) 02:36, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:47, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:47, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Google turned up little to nothing. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 05:02, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.