The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 01:56, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NASRAC[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed by IP without comment. This article was twice declined at AfC, both times with the comment "submission is unsourced or contains only unreliable sources". At the time, the only sources were to the gaming group's own website and forum, and that remains the case - in fact, most of them only link to the root nasrac.com website. There is zero evidence of notability, and no sources to establish notability after a search. Fails WP:GNG, WP:RS. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:59, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to lack of notability. Andrew³²⁷ 13:13, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No third party coverage, fails the WP:GNG. All these charts and history sections probably just belong on their own website (the only reference that seems to be used anyways), as they seem to have no importance or context outside of it... Sergecross73 msg me 15:13, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.