The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Listed for 13 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but not enough participation to determine consensus. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 18:47, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NETZ[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Product is no longer available. And organization's contact / web site is no longer available. Shulini (talk) 13:31, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Both not a valid reason for deletion and I've found the current web site which I've added to the article. However, I've no idea if this software is notable. Edgepedia (talk) 12:47, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW (Talk) 19:02, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The web page mentioned is a page to a distributor and not the original software developer. The software is simply unavailable and therefore cannot be notable. Please let me know your views. Shulini (talk) 10:36, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.