The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 01:49, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NFOrce[edit]

NFOrce (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)

This article fails WP:WEB for lack of third-party coverage. As it also asserts no notability, it could be speedily deleted per WP:CSD#A7, but in view of the article's age and number of contributors, an AfD is perhaps in order. Sandstein 16:29, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete While the site is popular (~5200 Alexa Traffic rank) they've manged to keep under the radar enough that no one has done a story on them outside of web based file sharing news stories (i.e. places like Slyck).--Crossmr 17:56, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.