The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:42, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NWA Charlotte[edit]

Does not seem very notable. The promotion lasted less than a year and didn't do much during that time. I didn't find any reliable third party sites during my search, just mostly primary and a few non-proven ones. I am also nominating the following related pages:

If this is found not notable, then the template (Template:NWA Charlotte) should be deleted along with it.--WillC 15:21, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —WillC 15:52, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. —WillC 15:52, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Small, non-notable promotion. Also precedent for deleting articles on individual title histories. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:16, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all, didn't even last a year. No reliable third party sources that I could find. Nikki♥311 20:43, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all, we're not talking about a promo from 50 years ago that lasted a couple of decades, we're talking about something which started last year and couldn't last 12 months. Darrenhusted (talk) 21:22, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Darrenhusted. Get Dumb 08:35, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.