The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nominator seems to not understand WP:N. Leaving note on his talk page. (non-admin closure) Dusti^*poke* 03:44, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nadia Khan[edit]

Nadia Khan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NOn-notable person as required by the Wikipedia Notability Policy (WP:N) BurhanAhmed (talk • contribs) 12:03, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Article needs better references to comply with BLP standards, but notability seems to be established. --Soman (talk) 11:36, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:37, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:37, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Rubber-stamp Keep The nominator has clearly got his argument flawed here. How can one of the country's most notable actresses and television anchors fail notability? Mar4d (talk) 07:33, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.