The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Primary schools in Singapore. (non-admin closure) MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 00:10, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nanyang Primary School[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was tagged for notability. Tag was removed, by editor who apparently believe the school is notable and should have a stand-alone article. We don't generally provide stand-alone articles for such primary schools, absent a level of coverage not present here. Epeefleche (talk) 21:12, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Primary schools in Singapore. Primary schools are not inherently notable. Also, the article is promotional in tone. However, a redirect is more appropriate per WP:OUTCOMES. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:21, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Primary schools in Singapore. Primary schools are not inherently notable. A redirect is more appropriate per WP:OUTCOMES which is not a guideline, but documents the accepted practice\, and alternatives recommended at WP:DELETION Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:55, 22 July 2014 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.