The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:47, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nate Heisler[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN sports agent, fails WP:BIO. While superficially there are many cites, many are to blogs and stat compilation sites, generally fail WP:ROUTINE's debarring of routine sports coverage from notability, and none provide Heisler himself with the "significant coverage" the GNG requires. Also AfDing Beverly Hills Sports Council, the agency he works for, which is similarly situated. The creator of this article is an SPA for whom edits to this and the BHSC are his only Wikipedia activity (and work by SPAs are common to both), raising WP:COI issues. Ravenswing 12:02, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 15:35, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:17, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:17, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete after I reviewed all the other 29 references (with duplicates), there's nothing of biographical significant about him in RS. Also given it is a work of WP:SPA the deliberate attempt of overciting is clearly attempt to create fake WP:SIGCOV, example citing baseball-reference.com 8 times in the lead. — Ammarpad (talk) 20:24, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable sports agent.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:54, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.