The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:29, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nathaniel Wiley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sources at all, even the website given doesn't work. The article only says Wiley's webcomic is notable, while even giving a poor reason for that. Brightgalrs (/braɪtˈɡæl.ərˌɛs/)^[1] 04:26, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 April 7. Snotbot  t • c »  04:40, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This article was probably originally created by the subject when at college 6 years ago. I can't find anything online to suggest notability then or now. asnac (talk) 08:18, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete because of non-notability. –Ugncreative Usergname (talk) 15:33, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.