The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was send back to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/nbkrist. Sandstein 20:36, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Is there a rationale for deletion? • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It may be failure to meet WP:N. I'll poke him. For what it's worth, he appears to be a new editor who's blind diving into NPP. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 18:03, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A version of the article was previously at AfC where the good advice related to the need for reliable third-party sources - which is certainly the case in this version. Best outcome would be return to and completion of AfC process? AllyD (talk) 18:11, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I sure as hell wouldn't complain about that, myself. =^_^= --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 21:50, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 08:06, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.