The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:10, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nespak Society[edit]

Nespak Society (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

As far as can be ascertained, this is a run-of-the-mill housing estate. Article makes no claim to notability. Emeraude (talk) 21:35, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:NOTE. ThePointblank (talk) 21:49, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No suggestion of notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:26, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.