The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 01:42, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Net Plaza[edit]

Net Plaza (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD. The article makes no claim for general notability WP:GNG or historic, social, economic, or architectural importance WP:NBUILD. WP:BEFORE revealed advertising, WP:ROUTINE, WP:MILL coverage, and directory style listings. This is a nice, normal, building, not an encyclopedic topic.   // Timothy :: talk  01:13, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  01:13, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  01:13, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - fails NBUILD and GNG; not enough notability for a Wikipedia entry Spiderone 10:32, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:MILL and WP:SNOW. Having been to Manila, this building is not even seem on the skyline. Bearian (talk) 20:32, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:19, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.