Netceeing

• Delete because it is insulting and irrelevant. Alethiophile 02:40, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, it has no useful information whatsoever, and it is only useful to monkeys. In other words, I think it would be a waste of time to read an article like this. Funnybunny 03:46, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Cleanup Netceeing is a genuine term, used quite commonly on hip-hop discussion forums. However, this page is so utterly useless and POV, if it is not cleaned-up quickly it should be deleted. Chairman S. ^Talk 03:49, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I just made an effort to clean this article up. I did away with the major artists section that was the bulk of the insults, and I eliminated the majority of the POV. I ask for these votes and this nomination to be reconsidered. Netceeing is notable, and with my cleanup, it has the potential to be a decent article. It might also be helpful for someone with more power to close the editing section as well, so it will be kept in shape, and the insults will not continue. Oh, and I think using the term monkey to refer to readers of a hip-hop article might be seen in bad taste, and that comment should be edited to something more sensible. Thank you.--Pal5017 04:50, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and clean up (and possibly protect for a while) as per Chairman S. ... discospinster 16:03, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• I've changed my mind. Random idiots will continue to use this page to post irreverent, rival-hating crap that has no place in a respected encyclopedia. Delete it. --Pal5017 21:51, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• A begrudging Keep as above. Oliver Keenan 22:34, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Vandalism aside (including to this nomination), this miserably fails our verifiability standards. I doubt there will ever be any reliable sources on this. --Sam Blanning (formerly Malthusian) (talk) 00:42, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Leave It Up because it is funny and entertaining to see how it keeps changing all the time, hahah. the ever-changing and disruptive nature of the entry itself is perfectly representative of what netceeing has been.ntro 9:30om, 29 March 2006 (UTC) actually posted by 66.220.101.69 (talk · contribs), ntro (talk · contribs) does not exist

Keep the Page Netcees are a legitimate thing, however they are mostly immature kids. This wikipedia should stay, but its going to have to be constantly patroled for 14 year olds who want to add some nonsense because someone called them wack on a message board forum