The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 01:37, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Netwatan[edit]

Netwatan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looking through a google search for Netwatan, I can definitely verify that Netwatan exists. That is all I have been able to do, I can not establish that there is anything notable about this social network. As far as I can tell no reliable sources have ever discussed it. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 12:23, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, as per Wikipedia notability guidelines. &dorno rocks. (talk) 13:19, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 13:23, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - barely even asserts importance. Can see no significant coverage in reliable sources and nothing that meets WP:WEB guideline.--BelovedFreak 13:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.