The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:50, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neuton (network)[edit]

Neuton (network) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article that is a borderline G11 speedy deletion, with dubious promotional sources. Note that the Reuters piece is paid advertising and the Forbes piece (since removed) is by an ex-contributor. Does not pass WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 22:49, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• delete highly promotional non-notable subject. Graywalls (talk) 03:34, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:25, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.