The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to John Birch Society, as the magazine isn't particularly notable, but the John Birch Society meets the notability guidelines. There is no sense in completely deleting the article, as the John Birch Society is relevant enough to this article for a redirect. - Diligent Terrier (and friends)21:47, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New American

[edit]

Quick google search shows no coverage outside of the sponsoring institution, the John Birch Society; hence, the subject of the article is not notable. RJaguar3 | u | t 07:18, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Many organizations have publications for their members. Only a very few of those are notable in their own right. This isn't one of them. There's really nothing to merge: just make it a redirect again. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 07:22, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge (ec) to John Birch Society. Kevin (talk) 07:23, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Now I've seen The New American I see no reason not to just redirect. Kevin (talk) 10:59, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect - To John Birch Society. This article is exactly two lines and would fit in there, no sweat. TN‑X-Man 01:13, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to John Birch Society, speaking as the original redirect creator. Sufficient content is already present there and at William Norman Grigg (AFD by same nom, which should be kept). JJB 21:41, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.