The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Timotheus Canens (talk) 01:15, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
IDk why somone did this? i agree with it 100% but not complete the process? any way i saw it watchlist so i complete it Weaponbb7 (talk) 00:37, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I consider this subject not notable, The Boston Globe Published the article [[1]] questioning Notability of the institute. Dr. Andrew Walsh [[2]] editor of the Journal Religion in the News questions the main face of the institute Robert pardon's expert credentials seem to be merely claims he has told to the media and the media has repeated. [[3]] Almost all mentions in the articles cited are introduce him and then lets him give opinion on "x group" not in compliance with "Quotations from an organization's personnel as story sources do not count as substantial coverage unless the organization itself is also a major subject of the story". The only two articles to have any substantial mention him regard his opening intention to open meadow haven treatment center and then one of its opening, not meeting "it takes more than just a short burst of news reports about a single event or topic to constitute sufficient evidence of notability." he seem notable for the attleborro case then a smattering of articles outside of it not in compliance with "People notable only for one event" all book references in article are merely Works carrying merely trivial coverage... telephone numbers, addresses, and directions in business directories" Weaponbb7 (talk) 01:10, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]