The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. With the confusion about whether this is the right team for a redirect, I think deletion is the better option, as argued by several. GedUK  12:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New Mexico Thunder[edit]

New Mexico Thunder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can confirm it existed at one time but there's nothing else out there on this team (beware of other NM sports teams with the same name). PROD contested in 2006. Fails WP:GNG. Vrac (talk) 00:34, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • It doesn't have to go anywhere. That is a cheap argument. -- Tavix (talk) 18:13, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:04, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:35, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • The fact that you can't figure that out shows why redirecting is bad. There isn't any information that would be gained from redirecting, if anything, it would lead to disappointment and/or confusion. -- Tavix (talk) 02:31, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.