The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 07:14, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Orleans Pride[edit]

New Orleans Pride (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable event, fails WP:GNG and WP:EVENT. There's Southern Decadence, which this might be related to JMHamo (talk) 18:17, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:39, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:39, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:39, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Meets WP:GNG as per significant coverage received: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6].North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:06, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - @Northamerica1000: I struck out 5 as it was added in error. Not relevant at all. JMHamo (talk) 07:56, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Whoops, looks like I made a copy/paste error there. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:00, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. New Orleans Pride and Southern Decadence are two different celebrations.[7] Both have substantial coverage in reliable sources, both are notable. Here is a nice article about New Orleans Pride from a New Zealand newspaper [8]. (Note that "New Orleans Pride" was also the name of a Women's Professional Basketball League franchise, coached by Butch van Breda Kolff, 1979-1981.)--Arxiloxos (talk) 02:09, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per sources provided by NA1k - Article meets GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 23:30, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.