The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 19:04, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New Paradigm Films[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. Sources necessary for this or WP:GNG not forthcoming, neither in English nor Norwegian. See related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troll (singer) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rover (band). jps (talk) 02:27, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.

Ascii002Talk Contribs 03:12, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions.

Ascii002Talk Contribs 03:12, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable promotional, no coverage in RS. - - MrBill3 (talk) 03:38, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only claim to fame is winning a "People's Choice" award from a UFO convention; that's about it. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 05:15, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:04, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:04, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:05, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete looks as though its function is to direct people to its website or to stream the film in question. MarnetteD|Talk 12:19, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per failing WP:COMPANY. They exist yes, but lack coverage in independent reliable sources. And while their films may have won awards, the awards themselves do not appear notable, even for documentaries. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 00:29, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Subject fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG per lack of in depth coverage from independent and verifiable secondary and tertiary sources. -Ad Orientem (talk) 13:28, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.