The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:13, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Wave India[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on organization with no references indicating notability. I usually run a low bar for notability on political movements, but this case is an obvious self-promotion stunt and a google search gave zero non-self reference links. Soman (talk) 08:58, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Obvious self-promotion, violates WP:NOR and WP:COI. No evidence of notability whatsoever.--JayJasper (talk) 16:33, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:05, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.