The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:24, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New York City derbies[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are a series of article that have been added (Hudson River derby, New York City derbies) and edited (New York Red Bulls) to refer to a history and _possible_ derby between the teams that does not exist yet. There are no credible references to the title for the derby suggested. It appears to be an attempt to build a foundation to reference in the future. No such named rivalry or derby exists between: New York Red Bulls and New York Cosmos New York Red Bulls and New York City FC Adiamas (talk) 04:54, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. A.Minkowiski^{_Lets t@lk} 07:11, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Although there is clearly written here that (there's a much immediate regional rival for the Red Bulls to deal with: the New York Cosmos). But actual name of the subject that is New York City derbies is not mentioned in any of the sources like this and this. A.Minkowiski^{_Lets t@lk} 18:13, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 18:58, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - can't be a derby if they've never played a game, and they won't for another year, or the only game in history is in a secondary tournament against a minor league club. Plus there is too much speculation in the article. WP:CRYSTALBALL comes to mind. This deletion should not however be prejudicial against recreating the article in a year's time when there is actually something to write about (presuming there is), and hopefully the closing admin puts something to that effect in their closing comments. oknazevad (talk) 22:20, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - If any of these were to become notable in the future, then a separate article on the individual rivalry would be appropriate. -- Whpq (talk) 01:38, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no indication that any rivalry actually exists, particularly given that they have never played. Rivalries are inherently non-notable unless they pass GNG per WP:NRIVALRY. As the teams have never played this guideline cannot be satisfied by definition. Fenix down (talk) 09:38, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.