The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Barua[edit]

Nick Barua (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Successful businessman, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:44, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:47, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:47, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete another in a long line of articles on non-notable businessmen.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:45, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no indication at all of notability. Sources in the article are just passing mentions. Mccapra (talk) 20:21, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV. --Ashleyyoursmile! 13:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, non-notable – and arguably a case of G5. Blablubbs|talk 13:42, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:RS, tentatively. I can't see a single source in English. Please ping me if you find any. Bearian (talk) 17:53, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Subject fails to meet both WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV, based on current available sourcing. Redoryxx (talk) 23:29, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.