The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 22:46, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Fiedler[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person appears to fail the notability guideline at WP:AUTHOR. His name gets some Google hits, primarily in connection with places the book is sold and some blogs, but I do not see any significant coverage in reliable sources as discussed at WP:GNG. VQuakr (talk) 04:49, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 05:18, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no RSs which indicated notability. Moogwrench (talk) 06:51, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unsourced, looking through Gbooks and searching the web doesn't seem to find any reliable, third party sources to establish the notability of the subject. - Sudo Ghost 08:25, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.