The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The consensus seems to keep this, at least as a redirect, which can be achieved by editing. SoWhy 10:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nikka Costa (Album)[edit]

Nikka Costa (Album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable and does not cite any references. Abishe (talk) 12:44, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 14:18, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 14:19, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: according to Nikki Costa#Discography this album was certified platinum in Spain. Richard3120 (talk) 15:20, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep It probably sold few copies back then, but she clinched WP:N in her adult life, thus making this notable as her debut album. I moved the title to (album) rather than the capitalized (Album) per MOS. Nate • (chatter) 18:01, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Nikka Costa. A supposed platinum certification proves enough people bought the album to receive that certication, but without additional coverage in reliable sources, a redirect suffices here. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 22:50, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete While being certified platinum is usually enough for inclusion, reliable sources to make it notable are thin on the ground. I was going to say redirect but there is not much point IMO as it is a self titled album anyway. Mattg82 (talk) 00:32, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep extra references have been added to the article and as it went platinum there is a strong likelihood of offline sources for this pre-internet release Atlantic306 (talk) 19:21, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.