The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 17:41, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nikolaj Koppel[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing what makes him pass WP:GNG/WP:NBIO. Some mentions in passing but no in-depth coverage. (For example of in-depth coverage of a person in the same line of work see [1] which I reviewed just minutes prior to this, and where I found coverage that suggests that radio journalist is notable). This one, however, does not seem to have such coverage. At least, not in English - maybe a Danish speaker can help find some sources to rescue this? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:13, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:13, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:23, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per hosting of the Eurovision Song Contest, which is an internationally important broadcast. Well sourced and per WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 12:15, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I guess. I added the following sources which are independant and mostly contain significant coverage: [2][3][4][5]. Appears to be fairly well known in Denmark, the major claim to notability here would be the Eurovision thing. – Thjarkur (talk) 15:03, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - As I said with Bernadette Ní Ghallchóir, a Eurovision presenter is the face to an international audience, to propose they should be deleted because they are simply just "Doing their Job" or because there is no "in dept coverage" are reasons I find to be an irrelevant excuse. They are entitled to an entry, given the fact they have presented one of the biggest television programmes, worldwide. - Mrluke485 (talk) 19:16, 3 November 2019 (GMT)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.