The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 08:54, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nitipong Selanon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested with a claim that the article meets WP:GNG, but without explanation as to why. The sources listed in the article are routine sports journalism, which is insufficient for WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:50, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following article for the same reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:52, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:52, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep both, numerous sources exist for each of these very short stubs meeting GNG. These are sport stars and are reported as such. I could see creating a list of the relevant athletes as an article until each one grows beyond a stub stage but that seems unneeded if stubs are ok. Sportfan5000 (talk) 00:05, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - there seems to be a degree of routine reporting in the sources provided as some seem to be match reports, but there also seems to be some that could be more in depth. I would appreciate the input from a Thai speaker for clarity. Fenix down (talk) 11:07, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both - WP:BOMBARD applies here, I don't see enough from the heap of sources added to the end of these stubs to be confident in notability. Giant Snowman 12:45, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both – no evidence or reasoning that either article meets the general notability guideline. C 679 17:58, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 19:37, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 09:30, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.