- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete Not notable. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:19, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No Nay Never podcast[edit]
- No Nay Never podcast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability. SSTflyer 10:35, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree with above layla 13:50, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. SSTflyer 10:35, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. SSTflyer 10:35, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:GNG. No independent coverage, all seems to be self published, apart from mentions of nominations for an award it didn't win. crh23 (talk) 14:30, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No notability. Even the award for which they were nominated doesn't seem very notable. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:46, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as barely anything here, certainly no independent notability at all, searches found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 01:51, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.