The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 21:26, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nongnakham F.C.[edit]

Nongnakham F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources in the do not demonstrate notability via the GNG (see WP:NTEAM) and better sources could not be found. References are either not reliable, not significant, or not independent. I searched but could'nt find anything better. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 06:28, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 06:32, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 06:32, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 06:32, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Read WP:CIVIL please before calling people bastards. Nongnakham F.C. being amateur isn't the issue. It's the lack of sources about the team that's the issue. Dougal18 (talk) 20:47, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:32, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.