The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:41, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Novan Setyo Sasongko[edit]

Novan Setyo Sasongko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

contested PROD, failed WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. He played in Indonesia premier league, which is not fully professional league. No reliable source or evidence that he play in fully professional league *Annas* (talk) 08:50, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:26, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • The ISL is not officially sanctioned, the IPL is "Indonesia's official football championship", per this. GiantSnowman 13:21, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do we have any evidence that the IPL is fully professional? Many leagues are their country's official football championship, but that doesn't make them fully pro. That Jakarta Globe piece you link to is interesting: it implies that the IPL publishes little information of its own and has little media coverage.

    The IPL may be Indonesia’s official football championship, but tracking down information about the league remains difficult. Not all the teams have Web sites; for some reason clubs don’t see the need for them, preferring to communicate through Facebook if they bother doing so at all. The IPL’s official Web site doesn’t even list each team’s playing squad, and with local media rarely featuring lineups it is hard to know who plays for which team.

    Even if the IPL is fully pro, which the nominator says it isn't, are we sure that playing in a league with such minimal media coverage should confer presumed notability? Struway2 (talk) 16:40, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • A fair point. I'll have another look for more info/sources tonight and may reconsider my opiion. GiantSnowman 16:51, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - after further investigation, I'm not happy that this player is notable. GiantSnowman 19:44, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 15:41, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 15:41, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.