The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 12:15, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nozio[edit]

Non-notable website that reads like an advertisement. I nominated it for speedy deletion, but User:Sj removed the tag saying "add references, please", although no sources had been added. Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 23:45, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked SJ for his rationale in removing the CSD tag. The article had a HANGON tag and the author was seeking help, so at this point, I would not support a speedy deletion of the article---give the author a chance. But I do believe that in the articles current shape, CSD would not be wrong. The article has a long way to go to avoid deletion.---I'm Spartacus! ^{NO! I'm Spartacus!} 00:32, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm unable to find sources to support a claim to notability. If any turn up, I can be convinced to change my recommendation. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 00:39, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 00:39, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks notability, I'm seeing a few mentions in Google News hits but not what I'd describe as "significant coverage".--RadioFan (talk) 03:03, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This should have been speedied as a not notable website or spam. Obvious promotional article by SPA. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:53, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As I said in the nomination, I DID nominate it for speedy deletion, but it was declined. Same with the prod. Therefore, I brought it here. Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 18:34, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per notability. Alexa shows only 760 sites linking, which is pretty nominal in website terms. Also, judging by the traffic, this would only really be suitable for the Italian Wikipedia. Only 4.3% of the visitors are English speaking. Greggers ^{(t • c)} 11:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.