The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:43, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

O Fantasma[edit]

O Fantasma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I created this article as the IP address; I cannot speedy delete this article, so I can avoid creator and IP controversies. The article appeared to established the film's notability; however I think, not enough people have become aware of the film anymore. I don't mean to offend the film's targeted audience. In fact, I have been embarassed by my own article that hasn't improved for years. Feel free to comment if you wish. Gh87 (talk) 04:42, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CTJF83 20:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. IMHO, if a film wins an award at a significant international competition, it is notable. Jewishprincess (talk) 21:48, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.