The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Idiot. - Daniel.Bryant 18:34, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oaf[edit]

Oaf (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This is a dictionary definition entry which doesn't show much promise. It has also been deleted several times already, often used as a stage for personal attacks. I suggest delete, followed by page protection to prevent re-creation. (See also: WP:NOT, WP:PPOL) Tokek 04:33, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as a paradigm example of dicdef. Unsourced dicdef at that. --The Way 07:50, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete dicdef with little scope for improving beyond that. Nothing that isn't already available at Wiktionary. →Ollie (talk • contribs) 16:20, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above, or redirect to idiot. YechielMan 19:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• delete as dicdef. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 02:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Idiot, preferably, though Delete would be reasonable too. Krimpet 03:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and Salt. "strike out or remove (something written or printed); cancel; erase; expunge", "(usually, the earth or the land) sprinkle with salt or other poisonous substance to prevent the future growth of crops" per nom. WMMartin 16:32, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.