The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:23, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has different content to the very slightly differently named article discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oblique lumbar lateral interbody fusion (that was deleted per G12) but has the same problems. As I said before: "A neologism about a surgical procedure that doesn't meet the general notability guideline." While it no longer suffers from the OR problem, it is obviously promotional in intent spamming the doctors website backachedoctor.com and was written by a paid editor. SmartSE (talk) 20:25, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging previous !voters @Doc James: @Iztwoz: SmartSE (talk) 20:27, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article [1] does not even mention the subject in question. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:36, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Similar page that was deleted, re-introduced with slightly changed title- just a promotion of website.--Iztwoz (talk) 05:50, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.